Who the FUCK do you think you are?!?!?!
My grandparents were Republicans…all 4 of them. With one exception, their 7 brothers and sisters…my great-aunts and uncles…were Republicans. My parents were Republicans. I have, with one exception since I was of legal age, voted Republican for every “major” office (Governor or higher) I’ve had a choice in.
Republican values…as I’ve always understood them anyway…spoke to the ideas that government interference and regulation were to be avoided. They suggested that some people might be more productive, and thus more valuable, than others, and that was ok. They dared even suggest that he who was fiscally responsible, invested wisely and saved carefully, deserved to keep the lion’s share of his own money.
They spoke of such things as providing a strong military. They suggested that social programs were dangerous. Heck, some of them even had the audacity to imply that we might even be responsible for our very own actions. Can you imagine?
As both a Republican and an American, I’ve been disgusted for a while now with our current President. President Bush has committed us to a war on questionable (to say the least) grounds, against a non-existent enemy we can neither see, touch, feel, identify, or defeat, and he has done so with no clear statement of success or victory. These facts are shameful at best, tragic at worst.
But, even in light of those charges, I have hoped that what we were living with was an individual who, bluntly, was simply bad for our country. We’ve had our share of those at 1600 Pennsylvania, and the country has managed to survive. Again, I figured, we’d do so.
As a result…and those few of you who read this blog or know me outside of it know this…I have not been one to jump on the “AHHH! KING GEORGE! DICTATORSHIP! EVIL EVIL!” bandwagon. Sure…i think president Bush is an utter and complete failure as a leader of the Nation or of Men…but I haven’t really felt we were “descending to tyranny”.
Until now.
Under the auspices of “security”, here we sit, encumbered by laws that, at best, are on the ragged edge of what this Country stands for. “The Patriot Act”, and all its myriad restrictions, brought with it one of the more dangerous laws ever enacted in this country…it gave to CIVIL authorities, such as the FBI, the power to arrest and detain WITHOUT CHARGE. The mere assertion of treason, or terrorism, was grounds for INDEFINITE detainment…in MILITARY prisons, no less.
Now…to be certain, this is, indeed, dangerous. I submit, however, that the cliche “desperate times call for desperate measures” IS a cliche because it’s TRUE. The balance of 3 branches exists SPECIFICALLY to handle situations like this. Sometimes, even with honorable intent, a desperate reaction to a desperate situation is invoked. Sometimes, it’s the right thing…others, it goes over the line…and the checks and balances of a “3-sided government” are designed to allow the former, and deny the latter.
TWICE, before today, those checks and balances had done their job. TWICE the Supreme Court had ruled that there is a distinct, clear, and necessary line between civil authority and military justice….that there is, at its essence, a distinction between a CRIME and an ATTACK. The FBI may prosecute CRIMINALS, and must do so within the laws of this country….REGARDLESS of the citizenship of the accused. The MILITARY may defeat, disable, or secure ENEMIES, and will then deal with them in accordance with the UCMJ, again regardless of the citizenship of the accused.
That line is there for a reason. Committing a crime is a DIFFERENT THING than attacking the country. Prosecuting the former protects society from those who would cheat it…waging war on the latter protects the NATION from those who would harm it. Since the TASK is different, the METHODS are, by necessity, different.
What President Bush has managed to do, however, is to merge the two. He has, very neatly, manipulated the ituation such that the United States Military now plays heavy muscle for the federal law enforcement community.
The FBI is granted the arrest power of the military, but the detainee is then treated as an enemy…not a criminal. Nifty, that.
Today, in a 5-4 ruling, the SCOTUS AGAIN said that this is WRONG.
If you are charged with violating the LAW, they said, then you must be treated IN ACCORDANCE WITH IT.
The response…it all of its vomit-inducing SICKENING glory…prompted this rant:
Sen. Lindsey Graham of SC : “The American people are going to wake up tomorrow and be shocked to hear that a member of Al Qaeda has the same constitutional rights as an American citizen”
Does the good Senator HONESTLY BELIEVE that the citizens of this country will be SHOCKED to learn that we are OBEYING OUR OWN LAWS???
President Bush, indeed, said he would study the opinion and “determine whether or not additional legislation might be appropriate” in order to protect the American people.
THREE TIMES, sir, one of the two branches of government CHARGED WITH KEEPING YOU IN CHECK has done so…and your response is to look for ways to CHANGE THE RULES? Mr. President, I teach my CHILD better than that…I am SICKENED by the thought that your father…a man I admire and respect deeply…has apparently failed to accord you the same favor.
Sen. John Cornyn of Texas suggested that SCOTUS was “moving the goal posts on what the constitution requires” by changing the existing law regarding the rights of detainees.
NO SIR. SCOTUS is attempting to PREVENT YOU from doing PRECISELY THAT. They are ENFORCING the laws…laws that are the FOUNDATION of what this country stands for…that YOU and your ilk are attempting to circumvent. THREE TIMES you have failed to do so, and now YOU suggest the rules should be changed.
Perhaps scariest of all, Rep. Duncan Hunter of California:
“The Supreme Court just moved us closer to the day when U.S. Marine rifle teams will have to have lawyers read Miranda rights to terrorists captured on the battlefield.”
Representative Hunter, have you, sir, lost your mind? Are you so IGNORANT of the Constitution, or, instead, do you believe I am, as to honestly suggest that when the Supreme Court insists for a 3rd time that those accused of crimes be afforded the rights of those accused of crimes that they are even DISCUSSING the rules by which the military may do its job? Are you SO uneducated as to not even recognize the difference?
==========================
Republicans, your party is a pile of shit. The people whose ideals you profess to share are LETHAL to this Nation and its ideals. You are Constitution-shredding, power-mad, immoral KILLERS of Man, and Man’s right to his life.
I am ashamed to have ever called myself a Republican.